The logo of the Melammu Project

The Melammu Project

The Heritage of Mesopotamia and the Ancient Near East


  The Melammu Project
  
   General description
   Search string
   Browse by topic
   Search keyword
   Submit entry
  
   About
   Open search
   Thematic search
   Digital Library
   Submit item
  
   Ancient texts
   Dictionaries
   Projects
   Varia
   Submit link
  FAQ
  Contact us
  About

  The Newsletter
  To Project Information >

 

Terminology of hepatoscopy (1)

Printable view
Topics (move over topic to see place in topic list)

05 Scientific knowledge and scholarly lore





05 Scientific knowledge and scholarly lore




05 Scientific knowledge and scholarly lore





05 Scientific knowledge and scholarly lore




Keywords
extispicy
Greek language
naming
omens
Period
5th century CE
Neo-Assyrian Empire
Roman Empire
Channel
Etruscan culture
Helleno-Roman philosophers and scholars


Text
There is a remarkable correspondence between the Babylonian and the western terminology of hepatoscopy. The Etruscan material is lost and the terminology can be reconstructed only piecemeal from Latin and Greek texts. The systems are not exactly identical. There is a strict order of examination of ten parts of the liver in the Assyrian school: the “place” (manzāzu), the “path” (padānu), the “strength” (danānu), the “gate of the palace” (bāb ekalli), the šulmu (unclear), the “gall” (martu), the “left path of the gall” (padān šumēl marti), the “finger” (ubānu), the “yoke” (nīru), and the “appendix” (ṣibtu). This has no parallel in the West. However, a whole string of Greek terms looks like a translation from the Akkadian. The liver has a “gate”, a “head”, a “path”, and a “river”, of which “river” (potamos) and “path” (akeleutha) are found in the dictionary of Hesychius (5th century CE). The comparable Akkadian terms are “head of the liver” (rēš amūtim), “head of the finger” (rēš ubānim), “river of the liver” (nār amūtim). The binary logic of auspicious (right) and hostile (left) sections of the liver exists both in the Akkadian as well as in the Greek system, and above all in the Etruscan-Latin branch of the science - what is normal is good in the auspicious section and dangerous in the hostile section; malformation in the hostile section is good, and vice versa. Some imaginative associations are also common, such as missing “head,” indicating catastrophe of a leader, king, or country; or two “heads” indicating two rival powers. This parallel connects the factual Mesopotamian reports to fantastic scenes elaborated by the Roman poets.


Bibliography

Burkert 1992, 49-50Burkert, Walter. The Orientalizing Revolution. Near Eastern Influence on Greek Culture in the Early Archaic Period. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press 1992.

Amar Annus


URL for this entry: http://www.aakkl.helsinki.fi/melammu/database/gen_html/a0001030.php


Illustrations
No pictures


^
T
O
P