The logo of the Melammu Project

The Melammu Project

The Heritage of Mesopotamia and the Ancient Near East


  The Melammu Project
  
   General description
   Search string
   Browse by topic
   Search keyword
   Submit entry
  
   About
   Open search
   Thematic search
   Digital Library
   Submit item
  
   Ancient texts
   Dictionaries
   Projects
   Varia
   Submit link
  FAQ
  Contact us
  About

  The Newsletter
  To Project Information >

 

Parameters of planetary theory (1)

Printable view
Topics (move over topic to see place in topic list)

05 Scientific knowledge and scholarly lore




05 Scientific knowledge and scholarly lore


Keywords
astronomy
Islam
Mesopotamia
Period
9th century CE
11th century CE
Hellenistic Empires
Channel
Islamic philosophers and scholars


Text
The really significant contribution of Babylonian astronomy to Greek astronomy, in particular to Hipparchus’ astronomy, lies in the establishment of very accurate values for the characteristic parameters of lunar and planetary theory and in particular in the careful separation of the components of the lunar motion - longitude, anomaly, latitude, and nodal motion. The value of one of these parameters, the evaluation of the length of the mean synodic month as 29: 31,50.8,20 days is not only fundamental for Hipparchus’ theory of the moon but still appears in the Toledan Tables of the eleventh century. Islamic astronomy of the ninth century received its first impulses from Persia and India and assimilated the Ptolemaic refinements only somewhat later, in particular through al-Battānī, around 900. The earlier phase is mainly represented by al-Khwārizmi and influenced Spanish Islamic astronomy which remained somewhat outside the development in the Near East, Persia and Byzantium. But the European revival of astronomy beginning in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries took place mainly in Spain and Southern France and thus reflects again the Hindu, ultimately Babylonian, component of Islamic astronomy. Not until the full recovery of the Ptolemaic methods in the Renaissance of the fifteenth century did the influences directly traceable to Babylonia of the Seleucid-Parthian period disappear.


Bibliography

Neugebauer 1963, 534Neugebauer, Otto. “The Survival of Babylonian Methods in the Exact Sciences of Antiquity and Middle Ages.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 107 (1963) 528-535. [JSTOR (requires subscription)]

Amar Annus


URL for this entry: http://www.aakkl.helsinki.fi/melammu/database/gen_html/a0001097.php


Illustrations
No pictures


^
T
O
P